Notice: Undefined index: Inst in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: Country in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: dataDir in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: diskQuota in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: DataSample in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: activeProject in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: oeb_community in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: oeb_roles in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 34

Notice: Undefined index: pass1 in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 37

Notice: Undefined index: Token in /home/user/VRE/libs/classes/User.php on line 42

Notice: Undefined index: mongo in /home/user/VRE/libs/projects.inc.php on line 311

Notice: Undefined index: mongo in /home/user/VRE/libs/projects.inc.php on line 311
OpenEBench | Virtual Research Environment

Select Tool

1
Select tool
2
Configure tool
Select a tool
LOADING
Tool Description Author Operations Long Description Keywords Metakeywords id visualizer
GMI Outbreak Detection Service to measure the performance of the GMI outbreak detection system using a phylogenomic pipeline. Sara Monzón, Isabel Cuesta Evaluate Tree The Global Microbial Identifier pathogen tracking initiative (GMI) develops a global resource of sequence data for identification and diagnostics of pathogenic organisms and infectious diseases. A worldwide network of shared genomic information for bacterial, viral, and parasitic microorganisms can be used widely, from establishing a global disease outbreak detection system to personalised medicine. human-microbiome, virus, phylogenetics phylogenetics GMI_OD
TransBioNet WG1: CNVs benchmark 2020 TransBioNet's working group #1 (WG1) focuses in Standards and Benchmarking of different relevant aspects for translational bioinformatics. In this context, there is a concerted effort on benchmarking structural variants, especially, on copy number variations (CNVs) Lorena de la Fuente Evaluate CNV predictions genomics, CNV, Structural Variants genomics, CNV, Structural Variants, Translational Bioinformatics, biomedical_research, ELIXIR TBN_CNV
APAeval 2021 Benchmarking Event Quantification Evaluation of alternative polyadenilation prediction methods. 2021 Benchmarking event Alexander Kanitz Evaluate Poly(A) predictor A community effort to evaluate computational methods for the detection and quantification of poly(A) sites and the estimation of their differential usage across RNA-seq samples. poly(A), RNA-seq biomedical_research, genomics APAEVAL_2021
CAID1 Determine the state of the art in predicting intrinsically disordered regions in proteins and the subset of disordered residues involved in binding other molecules. Damiano Piovesan, Mahta Mehdiabadi Evaluate Proteins Intrinsically disordered proteins defying the traditional protein structure-function paradigm represent a challenge to study experimentally. As a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial for their accuracy to be high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in predicting intrinsically disordered regions in proteins and the subset of disordered residues involved in binding other molecules. A total of 43 methods, 32 for disorder and 11 for binding regions, were evaluated on a dataset of 646 manually curated proteins from DisProt. Intrinsic protein Disorder, Bindings, Prokaryotes Structural Biology CAID1
QfO 2018 Benchmark Quest for Orthologs Consortium - Challenge 6. Evaluation of ortholgy prediction methods Adrian Altenhoff Evaluate Orthologs proteomics, orthologs, phylogenetics phylogenetics, orthology, comparative genomics QFO_6
QfO 2020 Benchmark Quest for Orthologs Consortium - 2020 Benchmark. Evaluation of ortholgy prediction methods Adrian Altenhoff Evaluate Orthologs proteomics, orthologs, phylogenetics phylogenetics, orthology, comparative genomics QfO_2020
QfO 2020 Benchmark New Extended Quest for Orthologs Consortium - 2020 Benchmark. Evaluation of ortholgy prediction methods Adrian Altenhoff Evaluate Orthologs proteomics, orthologs, phylogenetics phylogenetics, orthology, comparative genomics QfO_2020_extended
QfO 2022 Benchmark Quest for Orthologs Consortium - 2022 Benchmark. Evaluation of ortholgy prediction methods Adrian Altenhoff Evaluate Orthologs proteomics, orthologs, phylogenetics phylogenetics, orthology, comparative genomics QfO_2022
TCGA Cancer Drivers Service to measure cancer drive genes predicted by individual tools and/or workflows. This is based on the efforts made by the TCGA working group Javier Garrayo - Salvador Capella Evaluate Genes The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is a joint effort to characterize cancer driver genes in 33 different cancer types from nearly 10,000 exomes. In such an effort, several methods for predicting cancer genes are constantly being developed and improved. This benchmarking service evalute these methods. driver genes, target_cancer, cancer genomics cancer_genomics TCGA_CD
LRGASP challenge 1 Identify which sequencing platform, library prep, and computational tool(s) combination give the highest sensitivity and precision for transcript detection. Enrique Sapena Ventura Evaluate Participant The LRGASP Consortium has organized a systematic evaluation of different methods for transcript computational identification and quantification using long-read sequencing technologies such as PacBio and Oxford Nanopore. We are interested in characterizing the strengths and potential remaining challenges in using these technologies to annotate and quantify the transcriptomes of both model and non-model organisms. The consortium has generated cDNA and direct RNA datasets using different platforms and protocols in human, mouse, and manatee samples. Participants are provided with the data to generate annotations of expressed genes and transcripts as well as measure their expression levels. Evaluators from different institutions will determine which pipelines have the highest accuracy for different aspects that include transcription detection, quantification and differential expression. RNA-seq transcriptomics, biomedical_research lrgasp_challenge_1
LRGASP challenge 1 Human Identify which sequencing platform, library prep, and computational tool(s) combination give the highest sensitivity and precision for transcript detection. Enrique Sapena Ventura Evaluate Participant The LRGASP Consortium has organized a systematic evaluation of different methods for transcript computational identification and quantification using long-read sequencing technologies such as PacBio and Oxford Nanopore. We are interested in characterizing the strengths and potential remaining challenges in using these technologies to annotate and quantify the transcriptomes of both model and non-model organisms. The consortium has generated cDNA and direct RNA datasets using different platforms and protocols in human, mouse, and manatee samples. Participants are provided with the data to generate annotations of expressed genes and transcripts as well as measure their expression levels. Evaluators from different institutions will determine which pipelines have the highest accuracy for different aspects that include transcription detection, quantification and differential expression. RNA-seq transcriptomics, biomedical_research lrgasp_challenge_1_human
LRGASP challenge 3 Mouse Long-read RNA-seq Genome Annotation Assessment Project challenge for Mouse ES cell line Tianyuan Liu Evaluate Method The LRGASP Consortium has organized a systematic evaluation of different methods for transcript computational identification and quantification using long-read sequencing technologies such as PacBio and Oxford Nanopore. We are interested in characterizing the strengths and potential remaining challenges in using these technologies to annotate and quantify the transcriptomes of both model and non-model organisms. The consortium has generated cDNA and direct RNA datasets using different platforms and protocols in human, mouse, and manatee samples. Participants are provided with the data to generate annotations of expressed genes and transcripts as well as measure their expression levels. Evaluators from different institutions will determine which pipelines have the highest accuracy for different aspects that include transcription detection, quantification and differential expression. RNA-seq transcriptomics, biomedical_research lrgasp_challenge_3